AJAD | Academic Journal of Art and Design
← Back to Volume 1, Issue 2

Emotional Labor and Interpersonal Connection in the Creation of Contemporary Relational Art

Jingtian Yang
Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 28-31, 2026 DOI: 10.54097/45qk3k82 July 7, 2026
Download PDF
Abstract.This article looks closely at the emotional labor artists put into contemporary relational art. Since relational aesthetics emerged, art has stopped being just something people view — it’s become a space for people to meet and connect. Yet few discussions address the emotional toll artists take on to make this happen. This article uses the concept of emotional labor proposed by Hochschild to analyze four representative practices: Rirkrit Tiravanija's gallery cooking project, Hu Yinping's town weaving collaboration with local women, Koki Tanaka's stranger collaboration experiments, and Song Dong's family memory presentations. Drawing on Olive Network's research on social practice artists and close readings of individual works, we map what emotional labor does in relational art. Emotional labor is both the backbone of relational art and a heavy, often unsustainable practical burden for creators. Artists are no longer just producing objects, but also investing a lot of energy to maintain connections between people. This creative approach breaks the boundary between art and life, and provides an aesthetic answer to how to rebuild trust between people in today's society.
Keywords. Relational Aesthetics; Emotional Labor; Interpersonal Connections; Participatory Art; Social Practice Art.
APA Citation Jingtian Yang (2026). Emotional Labor and Interpersonal Connection in the Creation of Contemporary Relational Art. Academic Journal of Art and Design, 1(2), 28-31. https://doi.org/10.54097/45qk3k82

References

  1. Kester, G. H. (2020). The one and the many: Contemporary collaborative art in a global context. Duke University Press.
  2. Bishop, C. (2023). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso Books.
  3. Blanes, R., Flynn, A., Maskens, M., & Tinius, J. (2016). Micro-utopias: Anthropological perspectives on art, relationality, and creativity. Cadernos de Arte e Antropologia, 5(1), 5–20.
  4. Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotional regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.95
  5. Irvin, S. (2022). Immaterial: Rules in contemporary art. Oxford University Press.
  6. Martin, S. (2007). Critique of relational aesthetics. Third Text, 21(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528820701423938
  7. Smith, J. E. (2009). The soul at work: From alienation to autonomy.
  8. Doss, E. (2006). Spontaneous memorials and contemporary modes of mourning in America. Material Religion, 2(3), 294–318. https://doi.org/10.2752/174322106778057865
  9. Abramović, M., Biesenbach, K., & Biesenbach, K. P. (2010). Marina Abramović: The artist is present. The Museum of Modern Art.
  10. Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.
  11. Bal, M. (2010). Of what one cannot speak: Doris Salcedo's political art. University of Chicago Press.